Sustainability, Infrastructure, and Development Committee Minutes

-
Council Chambers/Electronic
Members Present:
  • K. Redman, 
  • D. Craig, 
  • R. Deutschmann, 
  • J. Erb, 
  • S. Foxton, 
  • M. Harris, 
  • C. Huinink, 
  • C. James, 
  • J. Liggett, 
  • D. McCabe, 
  • J. Nowak, 
  • N. Salonen, 
  • S. Shantz, 
  • B. Vrbanovic, 
  • K. Williams, 
  • and P. Wolf 

Should you require an alternative format or a copy of the official minutes please contact the Regional Clerk at Tel.: 519-575-4400, TTY: 519-575-4605, or regionalclerk@regionofwaterloo.ca


1.
This item has Video

 

Chair C. James called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.

2.
This item has Video

 

Chair C. James provided a land acknowledgement.

4.
This item has Video

 

There were no presentations.

5.
This item has Video

 

There were no delegations.

6.
This item has Video

 

Darryl Spencer, Manager, Transportation Engineering, provided a staff presentation and gave background information pertaining to Community Safety Zones. He looked at Region-wide community safety zones, which his team advises against; instead, they recommend designating Community Safety Zones in priority locations across the Region. D. Spencer recommended a two step process for a Regional safety zone warrant, and provided an overview of the eligibility requirements related to provincial legislation. He elaborated on the points-based risk factor assessment that would be implemented, and that they would be implemented parallel to municipal speed camera presence. D. Spencer highlighted a name change adoption for municipal speed camera name to replace "Automated Speed Enforcement" and the benefits of layering Community Safety Zones onto School Zones.

Responding to a question from the Committee, D. Spencer explained that in the risk factor assessment, they look at land-use and the presence of pedestrian generators in the area, to ensure safety.

 Doug Spooner, Acting Commissioner, Transportation Services, explained that doubling the fines is not for profiteering but is reinvested in safety measures for roads.

In response to a question from the Committee, D. Spencer answered that, pertaining to doubling the fines in Community Safety Zones, the Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMP) program was implemented to deal with the large volume of tickets. Accordingly, the only way to not double fines is to not adopt the AMP.

In reply to a question from the Committee, D. Spencer explained that damaging of speed cameras is typically rare and that mitigation efforts are in place to prevent that. 

Responding to a question from the Committee, D. Spencer iterated that, for area municipality input, it pertains mainly to Regional Roads, so though there is input from them, the Region is mostly impacted. D. Spooner explained there is communication plans in place, including on the website, but that there are gaps in public input.

Replying to a question from the Committee, D. Spooner clarified that there currently are areas where fines are doubled, but this will add to where it is being applied.

Staff were directed to bring back a report outlining all the particular changes which would occur with this program. D. Spooner indicated staff are intending to work with area municipalities in this regard, and confirmed that a report will be brought back.

K. Williams joined the meeting at 4:07 PM. ()
J. Liggett joined the meeting at 4:15 PM. ()
M. Harris joined the meeting at 4:37 PM. ()
J. Erb joined the meeting at 4:48 PM. ()
  • Moved byB. Vrbanovic
    Seconded byS. Foxton

    That the Regional Municipality of Waterloo refer the motion to a working group comprised of Regional and Area Municipal staff and Councillors, to be brought back at a later date.

    In Favor (14)B. Vrbanovic, J. Erb, J. Nowak, M. Harris, S. Shantz, S. Foxton, J. Liggett, D. Craig, P. Wolf, C. James, R. Deutschmann, N. Salonen, C. Huinink, and K. Williams
    Opposed (2)K. Redman, and D. McCabe
    Carried (14 to 2)

Jennifer Rose, Commissioner, Engineering & Environmental Services, spoke to the report which was a response to questions surrounding a recently awarded contract for downtown waste collection, to determine best levels of service. J. Rose noted a change in the recommendation, part (c), where they removed the language of "garbage and organics" for specificity. Furthermore, she noted a correction in the communication section of the report in regards to communication that was in fact received from the City of Cambridge in the engagement process, as well as Kitchener and Waterloo. 

Responding to a question from the Committee, Cheryl Braan, Acting Commissioner, Corporate Services/Chief Financial Officer, explained that the service is not area-rated, and would expectedly be more expensive in rural areas.

In response to a question from the Committee, Jon Arsenault, Director, Waste Management, expanded on the accessibility considerations as it pertains to this project, acknowledging the uniqueness of each area and its needs.

Replying to a question from the Committee, J. Rose explained that conflicting correspondence was received from the Downtown Galt Business Association supporting bags for organics and separate correspondence from the City of Cambridge supporting carts. The majority were in favour of the carts option, due to cleanliness and storage considerations. 

In reply to a question from the Committee, J. Rose indicated that enforcement issues, such as in the City of Cambridge, are contingent on what is expected of area municipality staff. By-law capacity at the Region could be increased to respond to any needs.

Responding to a question from the Committee, J. Rose explained the number of days for pickup is based on calculated waste accumulation. J. Arsenault added that if waste is already being picked up from the downtown core, it would end up in the landfill, thus materials should be diverted where it can be.

In response to a question from the Committee, J. Arsenault provided that contracts have had inequity where public space receptacles are collected, but that certain areas have done their own collection. The wording of the motion was changed, in section A(v), to include "All impacted municipalities" instead of "the cities of Waterloo, Cambridge and Kitchener and the Region of Waterloo."

Replying to a question from the Committee, J. Rose indicated changes to tax space would be a Council decision. C. Braan indicated the service level change that would affect the budget would be considered ahead of the 2026 budget process.

C. Huinink left the meeting at 5:41 PM. ()
  • Moved byD. McCabe
    Seconded byC. Huinink

    That the Regional Municipality of Waterloo (Region) take the following action with respect to curbside waste collection service for Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (IC&I) properties located in designated downtown areas as set out in report EES-WMS-24-003, dated August 13, 2024:

    1. Approve Region administered and funded waste collection, processing and disposal service as identified as Option 1 in the Downtown Waste Services Review, as follows:
      1. Conversion to automated cart collection for organics and garbage collection
      2. Maintain blue box recycling, including dedicated cardboard collection
      3. Provision of a minimum of four times per week collection in the tri-city designated downtowns, weekly collection for the designated township downtowns, and twice weekly collection for Belmont Village. And that to monitor this change within 6 months of implementation.
      4. Expansion of the tri-city designated downtown collection areas to include the full geographic extent of their respective existing Business Improvement Areas (BIAs)
      5. Direct Staff to discuss the necessary details with representatives from all impacted area municipalities related to the discontinuation of designated downtown public space/litter container collection service.
      6. Delegation of waste by-law enforcement authority to local area municipalities, if they choose. 

         

    2. Direct staff to negotiate and amend the recently executed residential waste collection contract with Halton Recycling Ltd. dba. Emterra Environmental to undertake this work, using provisional pricing provided under RFP P2023-33 Automated Cart-Based, and Manual Waste Collection, and Supply, Initial Distribution and On-Going Maintenance of Carts Within the Region of Waterloo, with contract commencement on March 2, 2026, to align with the termination of the existing waste collection contract.
    3. Discontinue the provision of blue box recycling to non-eligible sources, as defined by the new Blue Box Regulation (O. Reg. 391/21), for those properties located outside of the designated downtowns and that were previously eligible for Region administered blue box collection service.
    In Favor (15)B. Vrbanovic, J. Erb, J. Nowak, K. Redman, M. Harris, S. Shantz, S. Foxton, D. McCabe, J. Liggett, D. Craig, P. Wolf, C. James, R. Deutschmann, N. Salonen, and K. Williams
    Carried (15 to 0)

Oriana Aguas, Engineering Intern, provided a presentation on the Cambridge to Union GO concept design, along with the various options available for the case.

In response to a question from the Committee, O. Aguas answered that area demographics were collected for the report. The majority of the residents work in Cambridge based on the findings. She further noted that a report speaking to the timeline for when the project will start and when it will be completed can be expected in December.

C. Huinink joined the meeting at 5:49 PM. ()
M. Harris left the meeting at 6:04 PM. ()
  • Moved byP. Wolf
    Seconded byD. Craig

    That the Region of Waterloo take the following action with respect to TSD-TRP-24-012 dated August 13, 2024:

    1. Endorse the findings of the Cambridge to Union Passenger Rail Connection Initial Business Case and Concept Design study
    2. Direct Regional staff to forward the Council report to Area Municipal partners to create a unified voice to support the project
    3. Forward a request Metrolinx to:
      1. include the project in the Regional Transit Plan;
      2. continue the project under Metrolinx’ jurisdiction to further design and engineering to conduct a Preliminary Design Business Case, and to continue engagement with CN to establish a strategy for use of the Fergus Subdivision; and
      3. provide GO bus service between Cambridge and Guelph to meet current needs prior to the proposed rail service being operational.

         

    In Favor (15)B. Vrbanovic, J. Erb, J. Nowak, K. Redman, S. Shantz, S. Foxton, D. McCabe, J. Liggett, D. Craig, P. Wolf, C. James, R. Deutschmann, N. Salonen, C. Huinink, and K. Williams
    Carried (15 to 0)

7.
This item has Video

 

The tracking list was received for information.

8.
This item has Video

 

R. Deutschmann asked about speed limits in front of an elementary school in Kitchener, and D. Spooner indicated he would follow-up.

Chair C. James commended Regional water staff on the emergency repair of a valve.

9.
This item has Video

 

10.
This item has Video

 
  • Moved byS. Foxton
    Seconded byK. Redman

    That the meeting adjourn at 6:07 p.m.

    In Favor (15)B. Vrbanovic, J. Erb, J. Nowak, K. Redman, S. Shantz, S. Foxton, D. McCabe, J. Liggett, D. Craig, P. Wolf, C. James, R. Deutschmann, N. Salonen, C. Huinink, and K. Williams
    Carried (15 to 0)